User:Egg Centric/How Wikipedia benefited from chaotic libertairinsm then fucked up

NOTE TO WANKERS
This is a page I am creating to draft a signpost article


 * Chaotic environment works
 * How the fucking fuck did Wikipedia grow with consensus and shit like that? Everyone had a roughly equal viewpoint
 * Cliques not overly surprising
 * Many 'pedian cliques came from other websites not so major in number; after all not many "intelligent" websites in first place (and usenet all the "biggies" were close as fuck). Hence what intolerant cunts like greg kocks calls sexual deviants (and he is blatantly a paedo) - it didn't come about because of such being attracted to WP, it was just that the intelligent sexually liberated AND unusuaal were likely to hang out on a few websites because they were unlikely to meet each other in bumfuck USA. which is not a wikipedian issue itself (god knows I love sexual deviancy myself) but DID lead to cliques
 * Then it doesn't cause of cliques and other behavioural issues
 * wikipedians stopped focussing on things because of their merits and got into "politics"
 * yer average "political" wikipedian is too similar to yer.... average "political wikipedian"....