User:Egk006/Mitchell's water monitor/Bt021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Egk006


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mitchell's water monitor
 * Mitchell's water monitor

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The first thing I notice about your article is that it is very underdeveloped in each section. There is a good amount of references which are reliable so maybe you can find more info from the sources already on your website. The lead section is concise and already includes all of the info it needs to include. The content is set up pretty well, consider moving diet underneath habitat for a better flow of the article. I'm glad theres already a conservation section, consider expanding on the status and threats (any human threats?). The reproduction section is very short, consider adding info about males vs females and details about the breeding. There are no pictures other than in the species box, so consider adding other pictures you find interesting about the species in the appropriate section. The in captivity section is irrelevant and this information can be moved to another section, such as conservation (if added more details about conservation and relate it to in captivity).