User:Eguest-clemson/Karen C. Johnson/Skthoma Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Eguest-clemson
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Karen C. Johnson

Lead
Guiding questions:The lead is very detailed but not such that it overwhelms the rest of the article. It adequately describes the sections of the article, without adding any information that is not addressed later on.

Content
All of the content is relevant and nothing appears to be obviously missing. The content is relatively up to date, with the sources being from before 2015. It could be improved by adding some information about what she has been doing in the past 5 years in her new position.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone is neutral and there is nothing written to indicate a bias of the authors toward any subjective opinion of the subject. Her research is the topic that is given the most attention in the article, more so than the purely biographical information about her history. This seems valid since she has so much to contribute as a researcher.

Sources and references evaluation
The content is very well backed by reliable sources. Not all of the sources are secondary, so this may need consideration. The sources are relatively current, but it may be helpful to add a few more that are more recent than 2015 to assure the information is as current as possible. The links embedded in the article are well-placed and funcitonal.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
The contributor did not add images or media.

Overall evaluation
The contributor has improved the article in its readability and clarity. Small grammatical edits as well as expounging on information that needed more detail allowed them to improve the overall quality of the biographical article. Improvements could be made by finding more recent sources to ensure the information is as current as possible.