User:Ehaege01/sandbox

SA #25

Samsung Galaxy E7 - Wikipedia

1. What stub did you choose? Why did you choose this one? Copy and paste the URL link into your Sandbox I chose Samsung Galaxy E7 -, I chose this because I am interested in technology, and I have never seen this phone before and there isn't much information in the stub.

2. How do you know that it's a stub: Identify where on the page that you know that this is a stub. I know this is a stub because it was under the Samsung phone stub pages on Wikipedia and there is little to now information on this phone on its article.

3. What are some missing or under-developed parts of this stub? A good way to determine this is to compare your stub to a more developed article on the same topic and category. So, for example, if you chose a stub-article on a horror novel, look for another Wikipedia article on another horror novel that is more fully developed. What is missing on your stub page in comparison? You should devote 4-5 sentences to answering this question. Something underdeveloped is the hardware because it just says what the hardware in the phones are, there are no specifications of what these do like in articles of the Samsung galaxy S8. The software sections of the Samsung E7 has one sentence, and it doesn't even say what the software is. This needs to be heavily updated so it can tell people what it has and what that software inside is designed to do. It also has no more information such as sales or reception. We need to see what this phone has to offer and what it does and overall, there is just no information.

4. In particular, locate the "References" section of the stub. What, if anything, is listed in the references? If the references are hyperlinked, do the links still work? 2 of the 3 references work and actually do show some solid information about the phone.

5. And, when you compare this stub to a well developed article of the same category type, what sections of the overall article are present, and what are missing? The only sections this one had was hardware and software, it was missing many such as reception, sales, camera, issues with the phone, and so many more.

From Dr. Hildebrandt: Good job with SA #25, Ethan. This could be the winning article for you. Btw, I didn't see your work for SA #24 on the other Wikipedia page. Did you have any problems with that one?

SA#26

History
Crown Candy Kitchen makes their chocolate candy by hand.

During this challenge you will be disqualified if you: throw up during the 30 minutes of the challenge, go to the bathroom or leave your seat at any time during the challenge, or if anyone helps you but drinking any portion of the malt.

From Dr. Hildebrandt: Looks good, Ethan!