User:Ehernandez14/Prison sexuality/Amyaris Peer Review

Peer Review
'''Looks like you have not added anything to your Wikipedia sandbox. I will write the peer review when content will be added.'''

However, here are some suggestions for topics that would fit great for the article Prison Sexuality:


 * It appears the female prisoner subsection is quite outdated, consisting of information from sources ragin between 2011-2014. Check if there are new, fresh articles about the prisoner-prisoner relationships, especially on the female counterpart. Of course, if you find more information on male prisoner-prisoner relationships from 2018 and above, such articles would also work.
 * The "Prisoner and other relationships" section mentions use of sexbot manufactures. This might be a quite limiting subject to research. However, search if there are potential articles discussing prisoner's use of sex toys to sustain their sexual needs. Have there been cases of prisoners using hand crafted (DIY) toys using common objects found in prison? Have any prisoners ever made any purchases or receives gifts from visitors that are of sex-toy category?
 * Both Prison Rape subjects discuss only cases of UK and USA. Are there articles that discuss the occurrences and data for other prison instances around the world (Europe, Scandinavian region, China, Japan, South Korea, Prisons across South America, Mexico)? In addition, bot sub-sections have quite outdated sources - UK only cited article was published in 1988. USA citations spam across 1980-2011 of publishing year. Check if there are new articles.
 * LGBTQ+ Discrimination uses only 1 cited source across every sentence. Maybe try going more in depth of that source to provide more extensive information from that same article or if available find more articles that discuss LGBTQ+ Discrimination data in prison system. Same thing goes for Transgender and Intersex Inmates section - extensive paragraph section that uses only 1 cited article across the entire section. Either there are not that many cited sources discussing such topics or at the time of writing these changes this publication was the only one available.
 * Social constructionist approach heading seems quite underdeveloped. Although "HIV testing" and "Inmate contraceptive access" sections are not very extensive, they still provide just enough info in the subject. Yet "Social constructionist approach" seems quite all over the place. Similar issue of reusing the same source over and over again, also a bit outdated since from 2013.

These are some of the elements that I see the page would improve upon updating or addition of new content. I hope this helps with your article. Good Luck!

--Aleks (Amyaris)