User:Eiott1/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I reviewed the infidelity article. For the most part, I thought the information present was efficient and was relevant. At one point however, there's a section titled "The Internet." I feel as if that could have been removed for it just gives an example of how infidelity can occur basically. All the points seem to be from a neutral point of view. The "Responses" section appears to be over explained, for it goes far in depth about what can occur when infidelity is present in a relationship. There are numerous citations that work and that do back the author's claims. There is a lot of talk on the Talk page, such as what sections should be made to present information better. One conversation was brought up regarding the "Military" section being removed for the authors feel as if that would be subject matter placed under cheating/divorcing rather than infidelity. There is a small section that aligns with our class discussion on how infidelity might be a natural way of showing marriage isn't meant to be. Other than that part, the rest of the article goes on to describe that people usually engage in these affairs when given the opportunity and they feel as if they won't get caught.