User:Eisha Afzal/Effects of climate change/SomeoneAverage Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ablip, Curioussoul25, Eisha Afzal


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Effects of climate change

Evaluation
1- The article is very complete and detailed especially because the content shows the topics of interest following a pattern of development, i.e. it explains in each section the effects of climate change, therefore, the section "Rain and Snow" is unbalanced. I consider this because later in the content there is already a section called "Ice and Snow" which encompasses the effects of climate change related to snow, although they contain different information there is a discrepancy if you track content.

2- The content in the section "Human impacts as rationale for mitigation" is very weak, which indirectly creates a negative perception throughout the article, compared to the rest of the article. All the content expresses the consequences of climate change but there is no middle ground where scientific studies that could serve to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change are expressed. Especially when reading the section "Possibility of societal collapse" which is more detailed, but has a high negative content unbalancing the neutrality of the article.

3- there is content related to how climate change affects wildlife for example this journal: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43267496, I consider that the section "Wildlife and nature" could describe more information on how it directly affects animals or create a sub-section that is more specific to how climate change affects the animals.