User:Eitamh/Windermere/Natureab30 Peer Review

General infoWhose work are you reviewing?
Eitamh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eitamh/Windermere?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Lead
 * Great introduction but may mention an example of one of the laboratory studies for this specific lake? Maybe small details on why the climate and invasive species are not good cause for the long run. Maybe add a direct definition of what is an invasive species?
 * Organization -Good starting page and current status of the lake. What I did for my introduction was the importance of the lake for drinking water for local people and the studies around it. I'm not sure if your lake provides water for local people, but I do like the recent studies mentioned.
 * Sources and References - Good sources so far, and the more you add, the better the article. Good work
 * Content- Great intro and studies in the lake, but if you could get more the importance of the lake with local people around, I think it will give it more attention to this article. You mention "Top-down versus bottom-up control in planktonic systems." Talk about how those two processes work.
 * Tone and Balance-  I see no biases and a good starting approach
 * Tone and Balance-  I see no biases and a good starting approach

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)