User:Ekaras05/Canthigaster rostrata/Novaber24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Ekaras05


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ekaras05/Canthigaster rostrata


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Canthigaster rostrata

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The Lead is concise and not overly detailed. It provides necessary background information, but it also does contain some content not in the article such as the part about it being part of the aquarium trade (maybe you don't need it or possibly add a section about the specie's relationship with humans if you have enough content for that). It has a good overview of the articles major sections, but some are not mentioned (maybe add a sentence briefly encompassing diet/predation and also general mating/social behavior).

Content

The content is relevant, up to date, and covers a wide range of information on the species. I like the extensive information about their defenses since that is what puffer fish are generally known for. I also like how you were able to link this species to a variety of others, creating a picture of the Caribbean sharp-nose puffer's trophic level.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral and lacks any persuasive tone.

Sources and References

Many reliable and recent sources such as scientific journals were used and well represented. There could be more references in some sections such as the natural defenses section. (and remember they always go after the period, some of the earlier references were in the middle of a sentence)

Organization

The article is well organized: going from background information to defenses and food chain info to behavior.

There was one typo I found in Habitat and distribution: "Males of the species dominant large territories that contain the smaller territories of one to six females." (I think you either mean "dominate" or "are dominant in"?)

Images and Media

The images are well chosen and add a lot to the article. They help the readability as well as provide visual examples.

Overall Impressions

The content definitely improved the quality of this article, providing a well rounded summary as well as interesting details. The article is well formatted and very engaging with all the visuals. I would be interested to know the effect humans have on this species through climate change, pollution, over-fishing, etc; (if there is enough research out there). Overall looks great!