User:El.Guapo6564/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Bygrave slide rule

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I decided to choose this article because I am interested in the stars and how people in history viewed and used them. The topic of this article is about a tool that was used for direction using the stars. There is also not much information on the Wikipedia page itself but I believe there is more information to be found on the topic.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is moderately short. It lacks a lot of information and a clear topic sentence that describes the topic and much of the information is not exactly relevant.

The content on the topic is not relevant, the only information aside from the lead section is a single person that used it. There is no other information about the history, relevance, or why it was important in the article. The little information that is written in the article appears to be unbiased and neutral. Of what is written, the writing style does not appear to be clean or clear and looks to be poorly worded (in my opinion). It leaves a much to be desired.

There is nothing in the talk page other than Wikipedia stating it is a start-class article. There are only two sources noted in the bottom of the article. One source is reliable but was barely used, the other is not a reliable source is seems to be a lab work from Google Sites.

The overall status of the article is poor. There is a good base and good starting information. To improve the article, there needs to be many more sources which will be added with the much needed information. The article is also poorly developed.