User:Elainewongso/Persuasive writing/KZhengUBC Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@Elainewongso


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Elainewongso/Persuasive_writing?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Persuasive writing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * Lead does not appear to have been changed

Content

 * Author retains existing text and adds and expands to it
 * Content is neutral does not contain author opinion or bias

Sources and References

 * New content is well supported by a variety of sources including books and academic papers
 * Existing text is not well supported and lacking in citations
 * e.g. " It is the most commonly accepted mode in persuasion because it aims to be scientific in its approach to argumentation. In writing, facts are presented logically and faulty logic is avoided.", among others, should probably be cited.

Organisation

 * Sectioning of text seems to be a work in progress, a general framework of the revised article body is not provided at this time
 * Adding sections may benefit readability and organisation
 * Strategies for persuasive writing or examples across disciplines could be their own sections

Images and Media

 * No media or images have been added at this time
 * Topic may not necessarily require or benefit from media and images