User:Elasezgin/Montlake Cut/Mhdav9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Elasezgin


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Elasezgin/Montlake Cut


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Montlake Cut

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of the article summarizes the gist of what Montlake Cut is, however it could give a better overview of what the article will actually talk about. Try to incorporate a sentence or two broadly about it's history -- maybe the date is was built?

The rest of the article covers a lot of important information and I really like that the history of the Duwamish was more prominently mentioned. I think compared to the rest of the article the history section is a bit lengthy -- I recommend adding to the environment impacts as that is important to note as well and not considered by a lot of people who would be visiting the page. I think the present day part is great, especially because people going to the website would likely know it is used for rowing and just need a bit more.

The tone is great also. I didn't notice anything persuasive.

I think more sources could be added/cited in the history section. If this is all from one website then it should be confirmed elsewhere before added (even though a lot of it was in the original article).

Could be worth adding a photo of UW crew or a regatta going through the cut to showcase present day but I'd only do that if more content is added to the article otherwise it would seem unbalanced.

Side note: cut is capitalized and lowercase throughout the article. I'm not sure which is accurate but make sure it is consistent.