User:Elaw529/Dimorphotheca ecklonis/Patrickdoleary Peer Review

I liked the work you did on your article. I would make sure that everything that is mentioned inside of your introduction is mentioned again in the article- based on the rubric.

There does not seem to be too many gaps, but I would just try to find more information to include. It is an article that doesn't really have a lot to it.

In cultivation, I would try to find some examples of the hybrids and even maybe share methods to remove it since it is invasive in some places?

General info
ELaw529
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Elaw529/Dimorphotheca ecklonis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dimorphotheca ecklonis

Lead

 * There appears to be no changes to the lead. Based on information added, I would suggest re-visiting the lead to better describe what the article is about and to reflect any changes that you have made.

Content

 * Content added seems to be relevant; there was little added to this article but there were still changes present. I would add more on their use as model organisms as it seems like something that could be expanded on.  I'm not sure if you could, but maybe include an experiment as an example?  Content seems to be up to date and does not have any effect on Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

 * Tone appears to be neutral, there are no claims made about the plant that favor any side. No view points are over or underrepresented.

Sources and References

 * All content appears to be thoroughly obtained through relevant sources. More sources to gain more information on the topic could be useful.  Some sources, such as the South African National Biodiversity Institute actually have more references listed, it may be beneficial to look at this sources and see if they can be used to add to the article.  Most if not all links to sources work.

Organization

 * Content is thoughtfully laid out and well structured. There appears to be grammatical errors within the "Cultivation" section.  I would recommend reviewing this section to fix any issues.

Images and Media

 * not applicable

For New Articles Only

 * Not applicable

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Few facts were added but still contribute to a greater understanding of the topic; if possible, I would attempt to find more information about their stages of growth and if possible, more on the distribution or origins of these flowers.