User:ElaynaMaquinales/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rosenstrasse protest

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This is the main Wikipedia article for the subject of my source exploration project in this course.

Lead Section
This section does well to define the topic, giving a brief, yet detailed, overview of the subject. It does not include any information not discussed further in the article.

Content
This article does discuss an event surrounding the arrest and mistreatment of Jewish people in Berlin, an underrepresented group- thus it does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

The article is up to date, and does not weigh too much on one topic over another.

Tone and Balance
This article is flagged upon opening.

"This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (August 2020)"

"The neutrality of this article is disputed. (July 2019)"

Sources and References
Sources and references are up-to-date. All links work. Sources are from known and reliable publishers.

Organization and Writing Quality
Aside from the flag aforementioned, the writing is well-organized and well-written, with little to no grammatical/spelling errors.

Images and Media
One image is duplicated at the beginning and end of the article, with different captions, making it somewhat redundant. Images are laid out in a somewhat appealing way. Aside from the duplicate, the photos used enhance understanding of the topic.

Talk Page Discussion
This article is "within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia."

Discussion within this article's Talk Page does get a little heated, and information and opinions and impressions are debated. The term "crackpot" is used in reference to an editor's content...

Overall Impressions
This article is well-written and supplies a good number of sources that I can use in my research. Things mostly get weird when the article begins to discuss the "Wolf Gruner theory." This is the portion that receives the most discussion and especially criticism in the Talk Page, and may contribute to the article being flagged for a lack of neutrality.