User:Elbert Ainsteinium/Michael reaction/Kmainse Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Elbert Ainsteinium, Sach548, Kat3r1nayr


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Elbert Ainsteinium/Michael reaction


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Michael reaction

Evaluate the drafted changes
Honestly, there was not much information to go off of for the peer review, but Im sure that you knew that and I understand because Im sure it will look much different when you submit your final draft. The Article contained too much planning in the sandbox and not much actual information. Im sure if you put in 2 hours collectively your group would be able to improve your article significantly. So far of the one paragraph that has been changed, It was well done, but it could have been made a lot longer. The information was important and relative to the rest of the topic. I would say that the improvements did contribute to the article overall and improved it because it clarified the paragraph. The article is no more complete with these additions because it still said relatively the same size, and lacks a lot of information. There were no grammatical errors or any spelling errors from what I could see, but the paragraph posted was very similar to the one they edited. Adding images to the sandbox would improve the article, and it's an easy way to bulk up the wiki page without writing out too much content.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)