User:Elcamino67aaa/sandbox

I’m practicing how to bold.
Evaluating HIV/Aids in New York City, my main question is whether the content is adequate in supporting what the lead-in graph “HIV/AIDS deaths in NYC” depicts. The graph shows how the constant increase of the epidemic from 1980 to 1995. The opener of this article speaks of only the early 80's and then fast forwards to the campaign initiative “End the Epidemic” of 2014 and how 2 years later the reported decline is nearly 8% annually. The content below opening is a timeline that seems to only go up to 1989, leaving me wondering about the early 90's and what caused the sudden drop off from in 1995.

The tone seems to be neutral. It does highlight the gay community as the main advocates to responding and taking action against this new disease. But, it does in a way that glorify their efforts nor condemn those that didn’t take the lead.

Regarding sources, yes, the links seem to work and support the claims. However, the same sources is repeatedly versus from a variety.

For example, the first 2 are from an Encyclopedia and then under Medical research, 3 out of 4 in the first paragraph are from the same source.

In the talk page, it questions why their isn’t more emphasis on the city’s welfare program and what it’s doing about those living with AIDS. There is a question to why the most of the sources are coming from WP: Primary sources and from a single collection from a single archive. And then debate about whether a deletion was appropriate or not.

Maybe the above is why it’s rated as C class. Regarding WikeProjects, though there seems to be interest by various projects with this article, I’m not sure if it’s actually considered a Wikiproject.