User:Eleios/Minerotrophic/Kbruce01 Peer Review

Your article is excellently written and well presented. The three sections are clear and the tone you used seems perfectly appropriate for Wikipedia. There are no glaring issues that I can comment on. As a non-expert with basic education in ecology I still found the content to be accessible. However, I would be very interested in seeing more examples and an expansion to that section to ground the concept. Here are a few more thoughts and comments:


 * 1) This may be nitpicking and a misguided comment since I'm not an expert, but you seem to use vegetation communities and vegetation assemblages interchangeably. Are these the same thing? Also, isn't a synonym just plant ecology? I admit I've never heard of vegetation communities.
 * 2) "grown" in the first sentence of vegetation communities should be changed to 'grow' or 'to be grown in'
 * 3) Can you define "rich fens"? Or is it defined strictly by its alkaline conditions? I think the article could be a tad more clear on what a rich fen is and why it's relevant to the vegetation communities section.

That's all I have for you. I think the general takeaway should be to remember that the audience is supposed to be broad so I think you should spell out the importance of certain concepts and define jargon where appropriate.

Take care