User:Eleios/Minerotrophic/Turtlegeek Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Your article does a great job explaining a topic I have never heard of. Liked that you added the contrasting environment, as that would be something I would not know how to find on my own.
 * The lead does a good job at summarizing the topic.
 * Good use of journal articles - neutrality clearly seen. However, I did notice some articles are outdated (before 2000).
 * All links open.
 * I would suggest adding a few pictures but overall, the text is great.