User:Elexis-Wohlgemuth/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Enuma Anu Enlil

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article was chosen due to interest in history of astrological events and reports.

Evaluate the article
In this article, there were a few things worth noting. It would be a good article to add to because there is a small amount of information available within the specific Wikipedia page. It is also considered of relative importance for the location which it originates. The article also is in interest but low importance to astronomy. There were also only six references listed so there could most likely be more information. The article does seem to be written with an equal author and no statements in which they are trying to convince the readers of something. There could have been more details between all the different sections of tablets. Some questions that were thought of when reading include details like what did some of these tablets serve the basis of, or in other words, did they lead to any other specific discoveries during the times. Certain phrases could be written in a different way which would provide more clarity and professionalism. There was one example of a tablet listed, however, more would be nice. This article also was not edited very long ago but, if there are any other update in the reconstructing of tablets that would be something worth adding. Something else is that, if possible, there could be specific examples of the authors or people who worked on creating some of the tablets and observations. Another thing that could potentially be added are some pictures of what the tablets may look like. Possible side notes could be little facts about the tablet itself such as material made from, heaviness, how did the observers have access to the materials. More on the history of the tablets such as, how they were found and more on when they were significant enough to start being analyzed.