User:Elhagyousif/The Magnetic Interaction

#1-Introduction
The Magnetic Interaction Hypothesis (MIH), was first presented to the Physics Department, the University of Nairobi in mid 2000, and fist published at The Journal of Theoretics on October 9, 2003, after nonacceptance by many establishments. The MIH emerged, in response to researches aimed at replicating un-imaginable source of energy manipulated by sighted Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). The search, which related to the discrepancy between present high technological level, and failure to attained required alternative renewable ans sustainable source of energy, regardless of experiments such as the Superconducting Supercollider (SSC) linked with failures to understand mechanisms, such as that energized Aurora charged particles Ring current and related geomagnetic phenomena   the inter-atomic bond mechanism and many other phenomena. All these justified the author Mahmoud E. Yousif, to suggest a dual, mechanism and formula for magnetic fields interaction with different magnetic forms, producing the magnetic forces, based on magnetic parameters. The MIH had developed into several other papers and the invention of Externel Magnetic Field Propulsion Systems (ExMF-PS).

#2- The Magnetic Force
The MIH showed the attractive or repulsive force, between two conductors carrying electric current as shortening or repulsing mechanism, as suggested by Faraday in form of two produced circular magnetic field (CMF) which related to current direction as shown in Fig.1, where the magnetic fields B1 and B2 or CMF in Tesla, radius r1 and r2 are in metre, the conductor length l1 is in metre, and the magnetic force (Fm) in Newton. The formula is give magnetically by      '' BC1 BC2 r1 r2 l1   Fm  =  ———————————————            Newton        {1} 2k''

The theory explained the Catapult force or the motor effect,, as:

''B1 BC2 l1 r2   Fm  =  ————————————             Newton          {2} 2k''

B1 is a general magnetic field, BC2 is the CMF produced by the conductor, r2 is the radius of the CMF, l1 is the length of the conductor producing the CMF that interact with B1, the magnetic force Fm is in Newton. The MIH, also explained the Lorentz Force as a magnetic force, produced by interaction of both the particle’s CMF  represented by B2 and the magnetic field B1, the mechanism of which is shown in Fig. 2, and the formula by Eq.3. Fm = B1 B2 rm2 C sin θ = qvB1 sin θ         Newton          {3}

Resultant of both two equal equations in the box gives, gives Einestien Equation for charge in motion B2=qv/r2C Tesla.

#3- The Spinning Magnetic Force
The MIH, explained the spinning characteristics of protons by suggesting the spinning magnetic field (SMF) produced at proton’s poles. The interaction of two SMFItalic text, produced the Spinning Magnetic Force (SMFc), with characteristics similar to the Nuclear Force, with related formulas for magnitude of both SMF and SMFc.

#4-	Energization of Charged Particle
The MIH, also suggested a process for micro-energization of charged particles on micro-scale, as

K = B1 B2 rm C d sin θ         Joule         {4}

#5-	The Atomic Model
Based on above SMF, energization process and the fact that electromagnetic force is responsible about atomic bond an atomic theory was suggested stated, and as shown in Fig.3, that, at specific electrostatic atomic radius (ree), both the electrostatic force (Fe) and produced magnetic force (Fm), are balanced with the centripetal force (FC)}, leading to the stability of the atom as shown for hydrogen atom in Fig.3, thus

''me vo2      ZeQ                           ZeQ Fc= (—————) = (————————— +  B1UB2erme2C)  = (————————— + qvoB1U)    Newton        {5} rme      4πεoree2                       4πεoree2''

Where, B1U is the nucleus SMF, B2e is orbital electron’ CMF, me is electron's mass, ree is the electron's electrostatic atomic radius, rme is the electron's magnetic radius, vo is electron's natural orbital velocity around the nucleus, εO is the permittivity of the free space.



#6-	The Magnetic Moment
The MIH, also derived and explained the flipping effect (i.e. the magnetic moment) produced in magnetic resonance experiments as the response of an energetic charged particle's CMF to any specific magnetic field. For inter-atomic electron’s, this magnetic moment (μe = EO/BU) is

''me vo2  2πεovo3meree3          qvorme ''μe= —————— = ————————————  = μB = ——————     Joule/Tesla    {6} ''2B1U      q                   2

Where, B1U is nucleus spinning magnetic field (NSMF), μB is Bohr magneton, μe is atomic electron magnetic moment related to atom stability.

#7-	The Spectral Line
In the MIH, if the continual inter-atomic energization process is excited by external potential, the radial and related changes in the energization process, is obtained as

''rnqvDB1U       meVnVD En = ————————— =  ————————          Joule       {7} 2            2'' Where, B1U is nucleus spinning magnetic field (NSMF), vD is the excitation velocity, rn is the excited orbital radius, vn = vD + vO, i.e. the excited radial velocity, and En is the energization obtained at radial distance rn. This quanta of energy acquired by the electron at that radius will be radiated, as spectral line and of wavelength related to attained excited radial, given by        2hc       2hc λ = ———————— = ———————                 Å        {8} rnqVDB1U    meVnD

As seen in Fig.4, series with higher energies are far from the nucleus.

8- Refrences
1.Journal of Theoretics, 09-Oct-2003, at: http://d1002391.mydomainwebhost.com/JOT/Links/Papers/MY.pdf 2.http://www.exmfpropulsions.com/New_Physics/UFO_Sighting.htm 3.Ashpole, Edward 1995 The UFO Phenomena, Headline, London.

4.HORGAN, John February 1994 Scientific America, Vol. 270, N0. 2,.

5.Chapman S. 1968 (Auroral Science, 1600 To 1965, Towards its Golden Age), Auroral Science, Atmospheric Emission, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Norway, Edt. By Billy M. McCormac, Reinhold Book Cor. New York, pp 25.

6.SPEISER, T. W. 1967 Aurora and Airglow, NATO Advance Study Institute, England, Edt. By Billy M. McCormac, Reinhold Publishing Cor., New York.

7.Matsushita S. 1967 (Geomagnetic Disturbances and Storms) Physics of Geomagnetic Phenomena, Vol.II, Edt. By S. Matsushita and Wallace H. Campbell, Academic Press, N. Y, pp 811.

8.Axford, W.I. 1967 (The Interaction Between the Solar Wind and The Magnetosphere) AURORA AND AIRGLOW, Proceeding of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at The University Of Keele, Staffordshire, England August 15-26,1966, Edt. By Billy M.  McCormac, Reinhold Book Cor. New York, pp 1273/1282.

9.Akasofu, S.I. and S. Chapman 1967 (Geomagnetic Storms and Auroras), Physics of Geomagnetic Phenomena, Edt. by S. Matsushita and Wallace H. Campbell, Vo.II, Academic Press,N.Y, pp 1119-1133.

10.Trinklein, F. E. 1990 Modern Physics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, N.Y), pp 479.

11.The Report of The National Commission on Space 1986 Pioneering The Space Frontier, Bantom Books, New York pp 25-29.

12.D. S. Parasnis 1961 Magnetism From Load Stone To Polar Wendering, Hutchinson & Co. Ltd. London.

13.Nightingale E., 1958 Magnetism and Electricity, G. Bell and Sons Ltd. London, pp 16.

14.Avison,J. 1989 The World of Physics, Nelson, Ontario, pp 107.

15.Plonsey, R. and R. E. Collin 1961 Principle Applications of Electromagnetic Fields, Tata McGraw-Hill Publ. Cop. Ltd. New Delhi.

16.Butler, S.T. and H. MESSEL 1963 The Universe of Time and Space, Pargman Press, London, pp 185-191.

17.Alonso M. and E. J. Finn 1967 Fundamental University Physics Vol. II Field and Waves, Addison and Wesley, Massachusetts, pp 530.

18.Ballif, J.R. 1969Conceptual Physics, John Wiley & Sons,  New York, pp 338.

19.Fuch, W. R. 1967 Modern Physics, Weidenfield and Nicolson (Educational) Ltd., and The Macmillan for Translation, Zurich.

20.Halliday, D., R. Resnick and K. S. Krane 1978 Physics Vol.II, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 813.

21.Davis, P.C.W. 1979 The Forces of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133.

22.Elwell D. and A.J. 1978 Pointon Physics for Engineers and Scientists, Ellis Horwood Ltd. Chester, pp 313-317.

23.Krane K. S. 1983 Modern Physics John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 164, 165.

24.Giancoli, D. C. 1980 General Physics, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliff, New Jersey•