User:Elinruby/Clustercase

93, rue Lauriston is a French made-for-television movie by Denys Granier-Deferre first broadcast in 2004 on Canal+.

Summary
During the Nazis occupation 93 rue Lauriston housed the headquarters of the French Gestapo, known as the  "Carlingue".

German authorities relied on French criminals for much of the routine police work. Provided with German credentials, these thugs were untouchable. Run by Pierre Bonny, a police inspector discharged for corruption, and Henri Lafont, a prison escapee, the Bonny-Lafont gang hunted Jews and Resistance fighters, extorted and racketeered, and provided Tout-Paris with black market and other services such as pimping.

The film begins with the early-morning arrest of Lafont and his acolytes on 30 August on a farm encircled by police. Through the lens of inspector Blot's investigation of Bonny and Lafont after their execution, the film comes back to the sinister activities of the Légion nord-africaine in southern France and the French Gestapo in Paris. The policeman put together a thick file that compromised some public figures who associated with the two. But France had already put the épuration behind it and nobody was interested in his accusations. The film ends with Blot's bitter words: "Ah! Que la France est belle…" (Ah, how beautiful France is!)

Cast

 * Michel Blanc: Inspector Blot
 * Samuel Le Bihan: Léon Jabinet
 * Gérald Laroche: Norbert Boileau a.k.a. "Nestor"
 * Daniel Russo: Henri Lafont
 * Christian Charmetant: Pierre Bonny
 * Manuel Le Lièvre: Le Furet
 * Éric Prat: Pelleux
 * Hervé Briaux: Joseph Joanovici
 * Olga Grumberg: Odile Panzer
 * Jean Nehr: farmer
 * Jean-Claude Durand: restaurant customer
 * Julien Cafaro: journalist
 * Christian Bouillette: division inspector
 * Philippe Vieux: Paul Hervieu
 * Pierre Aussedat: man with paintings

on circular references
Once the disinformation is on wikipedia, and English wikipedia especially, it becomes an idée reçue and gets included in all sorts of materials as background facts that "everyone knows", such as "snow is white", "If it wasn't true it wouldn't be on TV", and "everybody does it".

Summary

1-editor receives a mild sanction for something he unquestionably has participated in 1-editor sanctioned for socking but not for unquestionably being part of the problem on an ongoing basis for years. This action should make it more unlikely that other editors feel pushed out of the topic area. 1-editor who edits on the war in Ukraine, American politics, topic banned from Poland 1-editor who edits on Russian topics, topic banned from Poland 1-editor who does not edit in either EE or HiP is sanctioned for being part of the problem in Poland five years ago. Also gets an i-ban with the American politics editor, ok, unknown if there was friction there. Both these editors are now topic banned from Poland, which can reasonably be expected to have approximately zero effect since that is the baseline from prior to the case, this editor found to have been part of the problem in Poland based on approximately zero evidence.