User:Eliotwilliams10/Climbing/Jalengrable Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EliotWilliams10


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Climbing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Is the Article consise or is it overly detailed? I think the article is concise since there is not a lot about climbing on the internet

Content

Is the content added relevant to the topic? I would believe so

Tone and Balance

Are their viewpoints overrepresented or underrepresented? There are not that many view points so I would say underrepresented

Organization

Is the content added well written? It seems like a lot of things arent added to me since it is such a small article

Images and Media

Are the images well captioned? Yes

Overall impressions

My overall impressions of the article would be there is really not a lot of information on the topic and not on the article, so yes I understand it is hard to add things I would just say to add what you can to make the article a little bit longer like about climbing instead of links on the article