User:Elisabeth.Lavi/Affect (psychology)/Murphypuppy101 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Elisabeth.Lavi/Affect (psychology)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Elisabeth.Lavi/Affect (psychology)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Affect (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

What was good:

- Social interaction paragraph was well developed with key points and terminalogy. I liked how they defined aspects and gave examples and gave clear statements therefor the reviewer can understand their article.

- Describes certain aspects very clearly such as mood and uses valid sources and people to support their answer.

What needed improvement:

- Talk a bit more about Psychometric measurement and give more examples so that the viewer understands it a bit more.

Stuff they can add:

- Add to Relationship to behavior and cognition parapgraph.

Overall quality of the info:

- Really well written and researched info.