User:EliseSembach/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Alter ego
 * Article Evaluation

Pretty vague, doesn't define the topic as much as It should, rather focuses on examples from movies and fiction, could apply more to real world and give real life examples.


 * Sources

quite a lot of different sources, pretty strong sources but could use them to their advantage more in the text

Option 2

 * Article title
 * GreenWood
 * Article Evaluation

Doesn't describe the amusement park and the rides to full extent, vague, the awards section is not as complete as it could be, could list more information about rides and when it initially opened compared to now

Sources

Large list of sources but doesn't seem to have used the sources in the text, not sure the quality of the sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Alaska Passage
 * Article Evaluation

no pictures, doesn't give a good idea of what the movie is like or about, very vague, doesn't share significance


 * Sources

large list of sources for how little information is present

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Riverwalk
 * Article Evaluation

the article serves as a connection to list out all the specific river walks in the world, however it does not truly define what a river walk is or give examples by pictures, it serves as a directory rather than an actually giving one an idea of what a river walk is.


 * Sources

No sources listed as it serves as a directory

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Alt for Damerne
 * Article Evaluation

this is a danish women's magazine, as someone from Denmark who speaks Danish fluently I do not feel like this article serves it enough justice, it is very vague with no pictures or example of what the text generally looks like, but rather what/when it started publication, which is not enough, there should be a picture, maybe an example of an article or any other information that should be put in there that other major magazines have on their wiki pages


 * Sources

A lot of different sources, but it seems to be uneven compared to the amount of content in the article