User:Elitematterman

My message for any willing to read
Yknow its kind of hard to look at some issues objectively, because sometimes when you squint hard enough you start to feel that both sides of a debate have some amount of bad blood. I guess its good to remember that when it comes to forming a consensus its not a yes-or-no type of deal. Its not a this-or-that kind of thing either. Share your knowledge, experience, and opinion in open discussion to hopefully reach towards a consensus, in some views it may not be a good consensus but the point is that your trying to do the greatest good for the whole of wikipedia, and for the individual editors trying to make a difference. WP:AssumeGoodFaith along with the pillars are truly the best 'Guidelines' on how to operate in wikipedia and I think its always good to go back and read some of it over because sometimes its just in our nature to forget what we work towards. --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

To those who have a higher IQ
Oh yeah you can also like... lecture me about stuff i do wrong and how i should do it right in the future in my talk page. I most likely will keep it there for future reference (unless i find it offensive or it resembles a personal attack). However if you feel like it i guess you could call me an uneducated normie because its accurate. you could also trout me on the side --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

In fact here is a list of people who have been nice enough to correct me!

 * Lord Bolingbroke
 * Masem
 * Peterdownunder (From the simple wikipedia)
 * Lee Vilenski
 * Your name will be here (Soon™)

Utter Nonsense
I am a person who uses wikipedia. >.> Also idc if anyone edits my user page (If it's even possible) just in here it can be subject to deletion if i don't like it ;p Essentially its just a talk page where im thanos.


 * Finna one day become a gud wikipedian boi


 * I'd like to be a WikiOtter but it's probably not gonna happen. So far im more of a WikiJaguar (Yes I will stalk your talk pages). --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is great and it will always be great. The mop corps is great too, maybe just as great. Please show appreciation to sysops just tryin' to make wikipedia a better encyclopedia. --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Less nonsensical
Yknow if I want to get better at being a wikipedian i should probably put myself up for adoption but idk. i probably won't get serious im a very casual person


 * If anyone ends up here to see what kind of person i am on wikipedia: im not anyone capable of the big brain stuff --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Slowly becoming a better wikipedian by having people point out my faults, learning some of the articles placed in the Wikipedia Namespace and i guess MOS is a namespace..? I've seen it like in MOS:JOBTITLES but I don't fully understand it, YET. --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah. MOS: Isn't a real namespace but rather refers to sections under WP:MOS --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

I am currently (Very slowly) Working on the simple english wikipedia! You can find me at Elitematterman (Simple English Userpage)

Also am trying to help sort out the mess of RfCs that is Talk:Electric smoking system. It's been one of my first articles where I've had to participate in active discussion because theres a lot of concerns to put to rest. The article will probably be fixed eventually as some RfCs seem to be reaching conclusion, however others are not and would appreciate more !votes/views from other wikipedians. --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 16:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * UPDATE! Electric smoking system is now Heat-not-burn product and its finally all sorted out! (Actually it was a while ago) point is i'm going to chill for a while. Ping me if you want to drag me into anything! --NikkeKatski &#91;Elite&#93; (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

WPs I am trying to go by:
Note: Anyone With a good WP can potentially add it to this list by telling me about it.
 * WP:IGNORE
 * WP:Good Faith
 * WP:MOS (Still need lots of work on that one)
 * WP:BOLD
 * WP:SIGNATURE (Because im bad at remembering.)
 * WP:CONSENSUS
 * WP:NOSHAME

General list of WPs I should refer to

 * WP:ISNOT
 * WP:EDITWAR
 * WP:BEANS
 * WP:DDMP
 * WP:OUTING
 * WP:ITSCRUFT
 * WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC
 * WP:WIN
 * WP:5P1
 * WP:OR
 * WP:NOHURRY
 * WP:SNOWBALL
 * WP:THREAD
 * WP:INDENT
 * WP:TOOSOON
 * WP:BROADCONCEPT
 * WP:COOL
 * WP:MEDRS
 * WP:RECENTISM
 * WP:CRYSTALBALL
 * WP:NONAZIS
 * WP:SLOW
 * WP:WALLOFTEXT
 * WP:CPUSH
 * WP:COMMONNAME
 * WP:CONSPLIT
 * WP:LEADSENTENCE
 * WP:1RR
 * WP:3RR
 * WP:CIR
 * WP:DUE
 * WP:POVNAME
 * WP:CFORK
 * WP:SPINOFF
 * WP:SPINOUT
 * WP:SYN (Synth)
 * WP:SYNC
 * WP:SUMMARY
 * WP:KETTLE
 * WP:BOOMERANG
 * WP:BITE
 * WP:PUFFERY
 * WP:ONUS
 * WP:LISTPEOPLE
 * WP:NOTEVERYTHING