User:ElizaWu1/sandbox

Humanities


 * Everything in the artcile is relevant to the article topic. There are information about humanities in America and Europe, there can be information about humanities in other countries added to the topic. Most information are not out of date. There are up to date information about digital humanities appeared in the article. The article is nuetral, hwoever, there are claims about digital humanities majors and how STEM majors might affect our lives. I personally think these viewpoints are not neutral.
 * Functionally, all the links i have checked was working. The sources also support the claims in the article. However, the references might have some kind of biases involved. For example. the article uses the reference: "Theory and the Humanities, Once More" . This article was written by Mark Bauerlein ,a professor of English at Emory University,. The source was mainly perfsonal interpretaion which i believe may involve biased information.
 * There are converstaions going on behind the scenes about how certain terms might lead to wrong understandings. For example,with the use of the word “manipulative“ in the current version of this sentence. As it is understood in common parlance, this sentence could lead people to believe that the experimental method engages in manipulating people,  rather than the conditions necessary to draw scientific conclusion.
 * Humanities has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Society. This article has been rated as B-Class.

Exercise: Add a citation

Dreyer, Edward L. “Zhen He: China and the oceans in the early Ming dynasty, 1405-1433” (Published in New York: Pearson Longman, [2007]).