User:Elizhann/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Katherine Fernandez Rundle
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I am moving to Miami and interested in the State Attorney's Office there.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Too concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Seems up to date as of 2017
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Unsure

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? No- there seems to be some bias "prosecution of an innocent teenager" title heading
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes see above
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? See above
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There seem to be a good # of sources!
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Seems so
 * Are the sources current? Unsure
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Needs development / Stub Class
 * What are the article's strengths? I like the subheadings under her Career Section with notable events from her career
 * How can the article be improved? Add more incidents from her tenure as State Attorney so that the one or two scandals mentioned don't seem like they're the only things that she has been involved with
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: