User:Ellaladd/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Internet in Bahrain

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
We chose the article at random from the list of "C-Class" articles

Evaluate the article
It does have an introductory sentence

It does not include a description of the content of the article

The content of the lead isn't related to the overall theme and content of the article

The content of the article is mostly related to the overall theme. The list of "arrested bloggers" is pretty random and irrelevant though.

The content isn't necessarily up to date. Most evidence and information is from between 2000-2015.

It talks about a culture/country that I've heard very little information about in the past.

Yes, the article is neutral and the writers are just telling us information how it is rather than giving their opinions on them. There are no strong, opinionated claims

The sources aren't great. A lot of them don't have citations, and the majority of sources are fairly old. The links I clicked on did not work. They either said "error", took me to a very random website, or were in a database that I had to log into/pay for to view.

The organization of the article is pretty random. They just jump around from paragraph to paragraph, and talk about different topics in each one. Although most paragraph topics relate to the overall topic of the paragraph, they don't flow together well. I wouldn't say the article is too well written either. They are just stating a lot of facts and not backing them up with any analysis. It doesn't flow very well.

There are no images in the article.

The talk page mostly just consists of a few people explaining the changes they made. I don't see any real conversations about the topic.

Overall, I don't think this was a very well written or organized article. Yes, they had some good information and facts, but they lacked backing their facts up with reliable evidence and sources, so the information could very well be false. It also fails to back any evidence up with analysis. I think it could be improved by better organizing paragraphs and their topics, the usage of reliable sources/citing sources, and analysis of evidence.