User:EllieTibis/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730806081

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have a personal interest in the topic, it is important because it is a popular and well known dance competition. My preliminary impression was that the article was well-written but underdeveloped.

Evaluate the article
The lead includes an introductory sentence that briefly but fully describes the Youth American Grand Prix. It does not include a description of the major sections of the article. The lead only contains information that is later discussed in the article. It is very concise while also being descriptive. The article's content is directly related to the topic, it is not newly up to date, the last revision being from 2016. There is nothing missing or information that doesn't belong. It addresses a famous dance competition that specializes in ballet and contemporary, and is relatively neutral. There are some quotes from people who have spoken out about YAGP, all being positive. This article is just to inform not to persuade. Most of the facts are backed up by sources with a few needing some citations. The sources are from 2012, so they are not current. Most of the sources are from news papers or magazines, several of them do not work anymore. Since most of these articles are from dance magazines, there are better articles that are more up to date and peer-reviewed that would be better to include. The article is well-written, it is very easy to read, it is concise, it is clear with the language that is used. There are a few grammatical errors where a comma should be added in. It is organized very clearly with labels for each section. There are no images in the article.

The article is rated as C-class and is a part of WikiProject Ballet. The strengths in the article include the conciseness and the clarity in the organization. It could be improved with updating the information and adding in some images to accompany the article's information. The article is underdeveloped, it has more opportunities for information to be added.