User:Ellie Ntumba/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
French architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason why I choose the French architecture article is because I'm interested in the description and design of the history that it unfolds. I think it matters because, French architecture has brief impact on the world of modern architecture. This article is going to provide an insight on what French architecture is and why the design has expanded into marvelous creations throughout the years.

Evaluate the article
This article includes a brief introductory sentence explaining the overall points of the article yet, not a paragraph giving a description upon every key section explained in the article. There the lead is short yet concise in terms of developing the text within the upcoming sections of the article.

The article shares a good amount of information concerning the topic. It shares a descriptive overview of the content given. The article seems up-to-date with the description of every historical aspect of French architecture. Yet, architecture tends to evolve within it's own way. Considering there could be new buildings that could be shown as great representation of the key aspects of the article. Every seems to be in place for the article to make sense in away that every section shares a brief outlook on French architecture. Not only in Europe but the influence that rises around the world (that could be elaborated more; not only in America).

The tone and balance of the article is profound and neutral. As though it doesn't construct a biased perspective but, each description seems subtopic of each French style depicted in architectural history. Every description shares an equal amount of information. Giving the reader an overview of the history and changes of French architectural styles.

The sources must be examined precisely. The references are helpful in terms of checking other articles and facts that could align with the current content. Yet, some sources shouldn't be related to same topic as though they share uninformative resources. But, the article has references backed up by numerous amounts of other topics concerning French architecture. They do reflect available literature on the subject, the references are diverse and throughout. Peer-reviewed resources are available such as the links are almost all available to access.

The article is well-written and organized in terms of demonstrating a brief description of each subject with an informative introduction explaining the key aspect of the topic. All images have been captured and debriefed to align it well with the text. The images were a useful purpose to exemplify the description of every style portrayed in the text for the reader to help visual the initial concept.

The talk page discussion shares a different viewpoint as the audience tend to share a negative aspect of the article. Describing the text as it could've been more organized. This goes to say that the article was brief but need to be more concise. There's lot more about French architecture that has yet to be discovered in terms of pursuing a broader outlook onto the international stage, where we can view how it influenced the world in whole.