User:Elliesamide/Gun control/Gracezillaa Peer Review

Lead:

 * Yes the lead has been updated to reflect the new contest.
 * Yes it does include a introductory sentence.
 * Yes the lead includes a brief description.
 * Yes there isn't a section on China's protocols to gun control.
 * The article is concise.

Content:

 * Yes the content is relevant to the topic.
 * Yes the content is up to date.
 * The only thing missing is the reference section of the article.
 * Yes Gun Control is an important topic and its important to have an understanding of how other cultures deal with the issue.

Tone and Balance:

 * Yes the content is neutral.
 * No biasses.
 * Accurately represented.
 * There is no persuasion.

Sources and References:

 * Yes there are reliable and scholarly references.
 * Yes. they accurately represent the article.
 * Yes the sources are thorough.
 * The references are kind of current, being written around the late 2000's.
 * There are three references, one being Wall street Journal, and two scholarly articles.
 * Yes there are a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Yes the links work.

Organization:

 * Yes I believe that the content is well written.
 * In the second sentence, "is" should be replaced with "are".
 * Yes the content is well organized.

Images and Media:
N/A

Overall Impressions:

 * Yes, I believe that his content has improved the overall article given that there are tabs that explain other countries polices for gun control.
 * The strengths for this article are that it is well written and unbiased.
 * The only weaknesses I see are that the references at the bottom of the page are missing as well as the title for the article isn't a heading.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)