User:Elliewolsfeld/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=An_Experiment_on_a_Bird_in_the_Air_Pump&action=edit

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I think art history is very interesting and has a lot of history to it. There were many famous artists back in the day that created work that will be famous forever and will always be known for their talent. Their work is very captivating and learning how they were able to create all of these different pieces and how they were so creative.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Good introductory sentence with background information

No things that are obviously bias

No place where the author describes each section

I think its on point and is detailed

Articles content is relevant to the topic and it seems up to date but some things are not sourced

The links go to other wikipedia page with information on that source or person they are describing so may not all be factual

The sources come from wikipedia and go to wikipedia site

There is talk about how the article talks about a lot of facts or things that the author claims but are not sourced properly with no evidence that it's true.

I don't think its part of any projects and its rating isn't very high because of some of the questions people had about clarification and the amount of edits people have made over the years