User:Elliottimani/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Aaron Burr

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a subtopic of a subject that I am familiar with and am interested in learning more about.

Evaluate the article
The lead section opening sentence is concise and opens up the topic well. Given the complexity of the topic, being a human, the section has just enough about birth to death. Plenty of the content is general references and requires plenty pf review and improvements. Some of the content is unnecessary and could use some brevity. The citations are mostly up to date and open when clicked upon. There are some sections that require fact checking as there may be plagiarism. The works are diverse but still important to providing information on the topic. The article has a strange order that does not seem to be categorized by sequence but rather length? Perhaps by importance. Most of the images are right hand aligned but placed to break up the page visually. Most of the talk page is about how the page is de/encoded and jokes from Hamilton the Broadway musical. This is a not so hard to ignore disclaimer about the content and organization stating that the article lacks sufficient corresponding/edits.