User:Elloyd47/OLES2129

WK10

Good Article: Adelaide : Adelaide

- great layout - nice lead and detailed contents page

- info box extremely helpful, provides a great snapshot

- great media

- written concisely and presented in a factual, encyclopaedic manner

- extensive references list from mostly reliable sources

- well in line with their wikiproject:cities - contains info-boxes and several other templates required to create a perfect article

- well documented, supported by factual information and reflects expert knowledge

- to a large extent stable, however in regards to education, values, entertainment and arts information has the possibility to change regularly

Bad Article: Aalten https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aalten

- great infobox - inline with wikiproject :)

- decent media choices, captures everything you need location wise

- clear title

- information disjointed and irrelevant to the purpose of the article

- content is lacking and not a substantial amount of information

- there is a decent amount of sources, however the relevance of these sources are questionable and perhaps not necessary to the article

- invalid links to articles that need to be created?

- the writing of the article is unbiased and neutral however does not provide information about the town as such

- too specific in the information provided, needs to be more broad

WK3

Activity 2:

Citation was needed for a quote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:River_Irk (talk page)- changes made

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Irk (article - The River Irk)

worked with ewanmaddog/oles2129

Activity 4:

Article that needs clean up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti

tag added (needs more biographical information): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti#Family

talk page edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti

WEEK 5

BONE WARS _ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_Wars

Why is it a featured article

- good intro and contents page

- well cited and good amount of references

- as it is a historical piece, chronologically ordered correctly with appropriate titles

- all images have a good explanatory caption, spread out evenly throughout the article to assist with understanding and visual

appeal

- content is good - depth without excess

- very objective and balanced in the way that it was written - factual - no bias between both parties in the 'war'

- full historical account including background rather than just a 'story'

- consistent sections in both its layout and also the formulation of content

WK6

Activity 1 -

Big 4 Holiday Parks - added 2 sources and the only 2 references that were there

WK7 - Tutorial (annotated feature article) - Article - Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)

- criticising this source https://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/feb/04/rihanna-michael-jackson-manu-dibango?INTCMP=SRCH

- newspaper is a questionable source already (useful but perhaps not reliable)

- author has written a lot of articles - increasing their independent verifiability

- publication date is within 2 years of song release and therefore still relevant

- source is not cited at all - can we believe the information?

- tone is unbiased and neutral in manner

- very short and does not provide in-depth information

- this source provides a small amount of information in the article and only referenced one - only used for a quote and information regarding the law suit