User:Els1015/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Disability rights movement

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Because our class addresses a lot about disability justice.

Evaluate the article
Lead section - the lead section is basic and informative and it introduces important terms and definitions that may come up again throughout the article. It is concise and introduces topics that the article will discuss later.

Content - the content is relevant, informative, and expansive without being overwhelming. It also dives into the Disability rights movement in different parts of the world, which could help prevent biases or solely representing western thinking.

Tone and Balance - the article is neutral and informative. It does a good job of explaining the disability rights movement subjectively. There are no claims, the article is just informative and factual.

Sources and References - all of the sources are reliable and many are from university academic journals or widely regarded reliable sources like the Huffington post. There might be concerns with author diversity if many of them are academic journals, as many prestigious universities can be white male dominated.

Organization and writing quality - the sections are broken apart nicely and none of them are too long that they're overwhelming.

Images and Media - there are helpful videos of some accessibility attempts throughout the world, like alternative access to subways in Japan.

Talk page - the discussion in the talk pages mostly reference the sources and call some sources unreliable. There is also a discussion about the content and some of the word choice describing disabled people.