User:Elswicc/Impressionism (literature)/Bengalsrock09 Peer Review

Peer review:

Lead: The Lead paragraph is very confusing and doesn't explain what Impressionism is. I didn't know what Impressionism meant before I was reading the article. I feel like this paragraph should explain more on what Impressionism is. Literary Impressionism is a style of writing that captures the feelings or experience of the writing, and I don't feel like that was expressed in the lead paragraph. They started talking about different styles of literary impressionism in the lead paragraph and I think that could have been more in the second or third.

Content: I feel like the content was relevant, but it was mixed up. I feel like the second paragraph should've been the lead paragraph.

Tone and Balance: The article is not biased at all. It's straight forward and short. There isn't much of an opinion.

Sources and References: The references are reliable. There was four different references cited for a 3 paragraph article.

Organization: I feel like the first sentence in the paragraph is a run on sentence. I feel like after the word 'Movement' there should be a period. Then the new sentence should start at 'Many'. There are also some more run on sentences that could be fixed.

Images and Media: The article doesn't have any images or media. I feel like adding images would really help the readers to understand more of what Impressionism is.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)