User:Elswicc/Impressionism (literature)/Loftusjp Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Elswicc


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think your lead is very strong and concise and contains relevant information but does not overload the reader right away. I think the content you are writing about and the content you use is very in line and flows smoothly. I would say maybe do a hyper link to the definition of "prose" because that could be a literary term not many of the readers are familiar with. It was good to see that the links were working within the article, which help the credibility.

I think the strengths of this article are that you have a lot of sources within the article and hyperlinks that show you have a lot of evidence going behind what you are saying. I also noticed how the article was very neutral toned and was not persuasive but rather just informative. Overall, very well composed article.