User:Elvtf99/Albert S. Humphrey/Mhitt02 Peer Review

The Lead does include an introductory sentence that does give a brief description of the topic of Albert S. Humphrey.

I think it could be a little more detailed the article does seem brief and clearcut it gets the point across. The information on the article does seem unbiased which is great. I think his awards should get a bigger subtitle away from the Career portion of the article. I think the part of the article where it says " For a summary of the relationship of SOFT to SWOT analysis" it could be more descriptive to try and grab the reader and provide more information then just having them move to another page. I think where this article is at is a great foundation.

All the links I clicked worked properly. They all seemed to go back to a reliable source.

General info
elvtf99
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_S._Humphrey

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)