User:EmBean02/Coraline/AhsokaTano532 Peer Review

Lead

Content
 * No, I do not see anything added to the lead of this article however I don't believe this is were the most work for this article was needed
 * the lead does clearly describe the article topic
 * Yes, the lead does include a brief description of the article major sections
 * No, the lead does not include information that is not later clarified
 * I feel that this lead is very well written

Tone and Balance
 * yes, I do feel like knowing Coraline age is something that is important and does a lot to the actual story being written. However I do believe that the voice actors names should have ben left in the article since this article does mention the movie several times. I think maybe they could be moved to a different area then the character list
 * Yes, the information is up to date
 * I feel that all the content that is relevant is there however again since he movie is an important of branch to this book I think the voice actors names should be added back but maybe in a different sub-section
 * No this does not have an equity gap. This article overall gives a very unbiased and well detailed explanation of the story of "Coraline" without giving away the whole story. As well as giving a good explanatio of all the charters involved again without giving away the super fun parts of them that would spoil the whole story.


 * All the content added is neutral
 * Non of the information is leaning toward a opinion of any sort
 * there are no viewpoints that I can see that are either over represented or under represented
 * there is nothing in the article that I believe could be viewed as persuasive

Sources And References


 * The information that you have added is from a reliable source
 * the content does accurately reflect what the source cites.
 * Since this source is from the book itself It is both through, however I wouldn't say it is current but again it is from the actual book itself I don't think that matter as much
 * Most of the sources on this Wiki page still work, the only one that did not work was the Coraline video interview

Organization


 * This article is very well written is is organized well, and is easy to read
 * Form what I read there are no grammatical errors

Images and Media


 * Although this article only has one photo it does help the article. The cover of the Coraline book is so easily identifiable that it does help make this article. While looking at this article I always know what I am reading even if I don't understand the text because of that one little photo
 * This photo is well captions with the author, date published, and much more
 * This phot does comply to Wikipedia's copyright guidelines, and since there are no other photos there is little to no worry there
 * Although this does have links to other websites, I do not believe that it really makes this topic more discoverable to say. I would say the actual text itself really is what makes it the discoverable and the other websites are just other online text very similar to Wikipedia.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EmBean02EmBean02


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmBean02/Coraline?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Coraline

Evaluate the drafted changes
Up above