User:Emaddox2/DDT/Thunderbear65 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emaddox2, This article has a good lead in understanding the topic, but some of the information could be from old sources it might need evaluation. The content might require further updates, because a lot of research have beefed done on it to secure its credibility, and I don’t mind having a section about Teratogens link with development. The page is well organized that is simple to follow, so just to be safe I think a new batch of citations might be needed to maintain relevance. There was a great sense of neutrality in the article, and it was well balanced in its content in terms of an informative discussion of course. I think the content of this article will serve a great benefit for my group’s topic.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * DDT


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)