User:Emaridoby/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Misinformation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because i was interested in what misinformation really is and what it stands for. I originally thought it was about anything related to false info but it more popular then I though. Its related to anything written out to the public thats either half true or inaccurate.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

- Yes there is an good brief introductory sentence, with a short description on of the sections.

- No there is not info presented thats not in the article. The lead is concise.

Context

- Yes the articles context is relevant to the article. The article is up to date.

- Yes there is information that is irrelevant. No there is no wikipedia equality gaps or unrepresented topics.

Tone and Balance

- No the article isn't neutral, and i didn't catch any biases.

- There aren't overrepresent viewpoints, and they are described. There isn't persuasion.

Sources ad References

- The sources are backed up. Yes the articles are thorough. No the sources aren't all current.

- This article is marginalized by a diverse author. Yes there are peer reviewed articles. Yes the links work.

Organization and writing quality

- The article is well written and no there are no errors.

- Yes they follow regulations, and yes its organized.

Images

- No there aren't many images, and yes they are well captioned.

- Yes the images follow regulation. Yes the images are laid well.

Talk Page discussion

- The conversations are about the correction made on poor word usage. This article is rated pretty high.

- Wikipedia articles have a lot of research and eyes on topics so the information can be a lot and more in depth.

Overall

- The overall status was excellent. The article strength is is rating and short readable length.

-The article was well written, not many improvements. This article is well develpoed.