User:Emballou/TOX3/Cantybm Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

2.     What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any particular information that you found especially informative. ·        '''The article is extremely informative. It gave more information that can apply to many different aspects of molecular biology such as bioinformatics etc. I thought it was great that you included the components of the gene such as the number of exons and where to expect it on the chromosome. It was very useful to know where in the organism the TOX3 is and you spelled that out in your description as well. The information was explained well so that one that doesn’t know about the subject that you are writing about is able to understand the material.''' 3.     What overall adjustments do you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? ·        Saying what SNP means and linking it to a already established page could be useful to readers 4.     Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know. ·        No I didn’t but I think I want to go into more detail like you did 5.     Is all new content backed up by a reliable source of information? ·        All of your new content was cited 6.     Are the sources fairly current (> 2015)? Check a few links. Do they work? ·        Links are working and all are fairly current to today’s research. 7.     Summarize any typographical/grammatical errors that you found. ·        Here “The risk allele, rs3803662, is…” o  It would put the comma because you used the appropriate introduction of the allele scientific name. 8.     Student authors are responsible for all images on their page (even if not part of their revised subsection). Double check the original page to make sure images are acceptable and clearly described. See associated tutorial to review Wiki image requirements. Summarize your findings. ·        Only image available is the table and the information in the table is cited  9. Identify at least one additional reference that you think may contribute to the article. Explain why you think this article would benefit from the new information. Be sure to provide the reference in your write-up. ·        Edward A. Ruiz-Narváez, Lynn Rosenberg, Yvette C. Cozier, L. Adrienne Cupples, Lucile L. Adams-Campbell and Julie R. Palmer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev May 1 2010 (19) (5) 1320-1327; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1250 https://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/19/5/1320.short    o  This article talks about the polymorphisms in TOX3 that lead to breast cancer in black women and to find out why black women are more at risk would be very interesting material to share with the public
 * 1.     Is it obvious to you which sections of the article have been revised? Is the new content relevant to the topic? ·        It is very obvious to me which sections of the article have been revised. I could easily go back and forth to the newly revised content and the original content. The new content is very much so relevant to the topic. It is a lot more detailed then the original article.
 * Also liking Fox A1 and BRCA1 to already established pages or give a brief description of what they are and how does it relate to disease