User:Embalming Agent/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Strength-based practice

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is related to my career field of social work. This is my go-to approach with working with at-risk youth and I have seen its effectiveness in my clients as well as myself.

Evaluate the article
The article's lead section provides a brief but thorough overview of the article and reads like a proper introduction to a Wikipedia article. The content is a bit lacking- I would suggest including the standards of strengths-based practices as well as the different types of approaches within them. The "Outcomes" section is unfinished and implies that outcomes of strength-based practices have not yet been evaluated when that is not the case. The article reads entirely neutral and leaves no room for questioning so. The only source that isn't an academic and peer-review publication/scholarly book is the third source (https://www.scie.org.uk/strengths-based-approaches) and could perhaps be replaced with a better one. Though its presence in the article is minor. The article is organized properly. The writing flows well and is professional. There were two grammatical errors and one spelling error that I edited. The article does not include any images, though as it is an article of a social work practice theory, images would not serve to provide a clearer understanding that the text would lack. The talk page consists of a single conversation between one user asking about the proper nomenclature of the article topic with no further replies from others. The article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work. The article's overall status is a stub. Overall, I would say this is a decent article that could be built upon and updated. It provides the reader with a baseline understanding of the concept but it could include more information such as standards and go into detail on what kinds of approaches the theory claims, as well as an updated "Outcomes" section providing current evaluations of the theory.