User:Ember314/sandbox

=Talk:Arch Linux=

BTW i use arch
I realize its the appropriate time to mention that i use arch btw

Really important change needs to be made to this article
So on this page: I noticed that it wasn't mentioned ANYWHERE that i used arch, so I was wondering if I would be able to fix that issue. oh and btw i use arch
 * Arch Linux

Dedicated Arch Wiki page/section
The Arch Wiki functions as a wiki for many components that are common to multiple distros, and is widely accepted by users (and press) as a Linux wiki, not just for Arch.

I find myself in a multitude of various situations where I feel the need to express the fact that i, an avid arch user, uses arch. Perhaps that merits its own page, or at the very least its own section? 2804:1530:104:A793:5C78:F849:343C:7 (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm unsure if saying Archlinux is written in Python is correct
As an avid arch linux user, who DAILY DRIVES arch, I don't feel that this distro uses python, as I hate python, but I don't hate arch.FallingPineapple (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The installer archinstall is a default package included in the iso. Being included as a default part of the distro makes it part of the distro. - Aoidh (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If something being delivered on the iso then many many more languages could be included, would you consider arch to be written in shell? FallingPineapple (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * What matters more is are there reliable sources that consider it such. Reliable sources describe the installer as part of the release, and the installer is a critical part of the iso. When a source says Arch Linux releases starting this month will include a guided installer it's hard to argue that it's not "part of the distro". - Aoidh (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The problem with that argument is that in the Archlinux repo you can find 5 languages which don't come with the iso however are part of the archlinux repo FallingPineapple (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * and how reliable are dade2.net and techradar? FallingPineapple (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * there is no issue with the reliability of TechRadar, and the problem with that argument is that in the Archlinux repo you can find 5 languages which don't come with the iso is an apples to oranges comparison which means the comparison doesn't highlight any issue, especially since what you're questioning is backed by reliable sources, which is what we use to guide the content. - Aoidh (talk) 01:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

_ _  _              _ _        _     __ __ _(_) |_(_)_ __  ___ __| (_)__ _  (_)___ \ V  V / | / / | '_ \/ -_) _` | / _` | | (_-< \_/\_/|_|_\_\_| .__/\___\__,_|_\__,_| |_/__/               |_|                             _            _     ___ ___  ___  | |__  ___ __| |_  |_ _|   \| __| | '_ \/ -_|_-<  _|  | || |) | _|  |_.__/\___/__/\__| |___|___/|___|

frogFrogFROGfROGfRoGFrOg

* Hello, I'm Ember314. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to PageName have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (unintentional vandalism/test)

* Hello, I'm Ember314. I noticed that you recently removed content from PageName without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (unintentional removal of content)

* Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PageName. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (suitable for intentional nonsense or disruption)

* Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to PageName, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (variant for removal of content)

* Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PageName, you may be blocked from editing. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) ("please stop" for use after level 2 warning)

* Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at PageName, you may be blocked from editing. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (please stop removing content)

* You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did  at PageName. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (last warning for vandalism)

* You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did  at PageName. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (last warning for removing content)

* This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at PageName, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ember314 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) (only warning; for severe or grotesque vandalism only)

* This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at PageName, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.