User:Emeraldh01/Sea turtle migration/Yadukulakambhoji Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emeraldh01


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emeraldh01/Sea_turtle_migration?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sea turtle migration

Lead

 * The author did not mention any changes to the lead. The article is already well developed and has a strong lead and the author adds a few words about the added content to the lead for the section about navigational methods.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * All of the content is relevant
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * These are not relevant to the physiology of sea turtle migration

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Much of it is. There are some things which don't need a citation (claiming that turtles are ectothermic non-avian reptiles) and quite a few statistics or facts which probably should have a citation (like the specific distances that sea turtles travel, or the study that shows that turtles can travel in the same magnetic direction after being moved). In general there could be more in-text citations.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes. The author lists a few sources which have currently not been cited, the author could use a few more in-text citations
 * Are the sources current?
 * Most of them are
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Appear to be from a diverse set of authors
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * All sources used are from peer reviewed scientific journals. The author could use more sources
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links all work. The author should fix a few of the formatting errors in the citations, it seems like a lot of them autogenerated with a weird date format.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes. It's easy to read and well organized and all quite concise.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * The article is fine for the most part. There are a few minor errors which can easily be picked up on future rereads, and nothing interferes with understanding the article.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the sections make sense and the content within each topic is relevant. I think that if the topic is expanded, the section on physiological and behavioral aspects of sea turtles should be broken down further

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article? Is the article more complete?
 * Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content added organizes and adds to the section on navigational methods and introduces more physiology to the article, which otherwise lacks those topics.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * The author needs to add more citations for claims made in the text! The author should probably expand on the physiological and behavioral aspects of sea turtle migration section, or at least organize it a little bit better.