User:Emiell490/Positive psychology/Sfatima 12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emiell490


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Emiell490/Positive psychology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Positive psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Nice job in editing so far. I like you approach where you ask questions on what needs to be addressed.
 * Because you draft is still under editing process, I can not really tell if the sources being used are primary or secondary, especially where you mentioned in brackets, "citation needed".
 * The one source used so far in the editing draft looks good.
 * Nice job inserting different fonts while editing. It makes it a lot easier to recognize the type of editing being done in the article.
 * Looking at the third paragraph in your editing draft, is it the information found by you from the sources you searched yourself or existing sources from the original article?
 * I could not find that information in the original article that is why I would suggest that it will be easier to keep track of sources rather than leaving this task at the end.