User:EmilyLSmall/Celebrity culture/Stephaniegrisolia Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * EmilyLSmall
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:EmilyLSmall/Celebrity culture

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead was updated to reflect the new content added by my peer
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * No, the lead doesn't include an introductory sentence concerning the topic. This could be added to give a better understanding of the overall subject to readers whom may be unfamiliar.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead doesn't include all major sections, however, it does highlight an important section (social media) that is going to be revised by the author/my peer.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No the lead greatly outlines all the subjects that were going to be altered or added to the subject.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise, however, adding an introductory topic will aid in clarity and structure to the overall wikipedia page.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the added content of Youtube and MicroCelebrity is relevant to the topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * All of the content that was added is up to date, with the oldest article being published in 2016.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No content is missing, I think that adding the Youtube and MicroCelebrity section will complement the Wikipedia page as it stands currently.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content that was added is neutral whilst still exploring new ideas on the topic.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No claims on the subject seem to be bias
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The viewpoints that are represented look to be from one of an outside perspective on Celebrity. There are no actual first hand encounters of celebrity, just what is perceived to be celebrity and celebrity life.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No the content that was added is neutral and more informative than persuasive. It doesn't try to argue anything, it just tries to offer more information on the subject.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The sources that are provided are all reliable, most sources come from scholarly articles. There is one source (Forbes) that is not a scholarly article, however it was used appropriately and is a credible source.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The sources are thorough for the amount of information that was written and the content that was added.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, the sources are current with the oldest source being from just four years ago.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes all of the links to the article work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content that was added was written and clear to read. The structure of the writing flowed, which made learning about the topic simple and efficient.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No spelling or grammatical errors are detected
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Very well organized, I especially liked how the sections were broken down and the subjects of the sections.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The article does include one image, however, the image that was used does not enhance the understanding of the topic. It seems to be placed there for aesthetic appeal and to highlight the subject of social media, but it's not necessary for understanding the written content.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The images are well captioned, but can be revised
 * Ex. "a photo that displays different types of social media..."
 * Can be changed to
 * "Keyboard displaying different types of social media..."
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes the picture that was used adheres to WIkipedia's copyright regulations.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * The images are visually appealing and enhance the overall aesthetic of the page.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * By adding the sections of social media and Microcelebrity were great sections to add on the topic.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Mentioning social media is particularly important in today's society because of its significant impact on celebrity culture.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * The lead can be improved by adding a topic sentence to enhance the readers understanding of the subjects that will follow
 * As previously mentioned revising the caption on the image that was used is recommended

Overall evaluation
- I really enjoyed reading your additions to Celebrity culture on Wikipedia. I thought that they were relevant to today's society and added useful information and scholarly sources for anyone wanting to research further into the topic. Great work!