User:Emilyd1997/Shiny cowbird/Emilygeorge06 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing: Emilyd1997
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Emilyd1997/Shiny cowbird

Lead
I think that the introductory lead paragraph has been greatly improved compared to the lead of the initial stub article. It is well written and concise in its presentation of the main concepts covered within the draft article. It has been updated to reflect the new content added by the student and I think it introduces the topic of the article very well.

Content
The content added to the draft article is all relevant to the topic of the shiny crowbird and all sources are relatively up-to-date, with the exception of a source by Friedmann from 1929. It is evident that the student put a lot of time into their research on the topic of the shiny crowbird and I think that the newly added information compliments the draft article well. From comparing the initial stub article to the new draft article, I do not feel as though there is any information missing or anything that does not belong.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the draft article is neutral and there does not seem to be any indication of bias presented.

Sources and References
All sources used in the draft article are reliable and relatively up-to-date, with the exception of the previously mentioned source by Friedmann from 1929, and all were used appropriately in supporting the student's ideas. The only issue that I had found when clicking through some of the sources was that the link provided for the first citation connects the reader to a template of a Wikipedia article that does not yet exist. This should be reviewed so that the proper citation can be included as a source.

Organization
Overall, I think that the organization of the draft article was relatively well organized in its structure. There were no grammatical or spelling errors noted in my reading of the draft article. I definitely think that the structure of the content was presented in a concise and easy-to-follow format, especially with the Behavioural section of the draft.

Images and Media
There were no additional images or media added to the draft article.

Overall impressions
After comparing the stub article to the draft article I definitely think that there has been great improvement in the content provided on the shiny crowbird. The newly added content certainly compliments the article well and provides a more complete explanation into the behaviours and lifestyle of the bird itself. As previously mentioned, it is evident that the student conducted a lot of research to get this much additional information on the animal and I think that really shows through in the content. Well done !