User:Emilyfisher0/Natural Disaster/Snoops292 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Emilyfisher0
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
first sentence I think it should be "experience". The first little paragraph is relevant and informative, however I think wording could be a little clearer. Try taking out any unnecessary wording like "a combination of" if that makes sense. Maybe define what cyclones are... or it might just be me who doesn't know what it is haha. For droughts, have the highest risk because.. maybe explain why or give a little more detail.

But it's well-written and to the point, good job :)))

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Yes very neutral, does not seem biased at all! nice

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Remember to cite your sources in your sandbox!! Can be done with the "cite" button on your toolbar at the top. You can also link keywords to other wikipedia sites.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
I answered this one up in the content section but yes well-organized! easy to find info

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
n/a

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Great job! Possibility of adding in more info and making wording a bit more clear but other than that great job <3 hope you're doin okay!