User:Emilyhg.371/2019 Visayas earthquake/Kmcgowa2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Emilyhg.371


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Emilyhg.371/2019 Visayas earthquake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2019 Eastern Samar earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
The geography section is a good start, though the common produce part kind of draws attention away from the subject of the article which is the earthquake. A more detailed description of the geology as well would make this section robust. discussing the plates involved in the subduction zones mentioned. The first hand accounts section could simply use more first hand accounts, or could be included in another area of the article if this is the only account that can be found. Also I would give a slight intro for the quoted account above rather than just a description of the earthquake and locations it was felt. Damages section could include what was wrong with these buildings that collapsed or the dollar amount of damages in total. And simply more details would make this section a lot stronger. The sources section is a good start, though a few more sources could help in terms of providing some more details.